Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Almond's avatar

"by making rail travel more affordable it can increase rail passengers and fare revenue"

But in terms of commuters (and excepting some of the particular changes post-Covid*), no, it can't. Commuter trains into London are (roughly speaking) full. And when you've filled trains at the asking price you can't carry more people. And you've either got the price about right or you perhaps need to raise them. The government capped fares, so in fact, the TOCs wanted to raise fares.

The spare capacity is off-peak and could be priced better but you can't do much about high commuter fares.

It's also worth noting that the greenest form of transport (according to the Department of Transport) is coach travel, not rail in terms of CO2/passenger km. Yes, a full train is the greenest form of transport but a lot of them aren't full. All that greed pig capitalism at National Express and Megabus means they fill coaches as much as they can using airline pricing. If a seat to London is empty, might as well charge £7 for it as £0. Pretty much free money.

It would be cheaper and greener to shut down most of the rural rail and have coaches competing for business.

* Post-Covid there has been a decline in Monday and Friday travel as that's a day people tend to WFH but the prices are still the same as every other day.

Expand full comment
Quentin Vole's avatar

Very true, but it's worth noting that on the Continent (France, at least) the cost of travel to the place of work is an allowable deduction against income tax. In the UK, it isn't if you're on PAYE, but it is for the self-employed, which is a bit odd.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts