Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael van der Riet's avatar

Britain's wars have in fact brought about most of its social change from feudal system to where it is today, by decimating the peasants and sharply reducing the supply of labor. Labor-intensive industries had to up pay and benefits to steal workers from each other. The Great War was a final nail in the coffin, but it all started with the Hundred Years War and Thirty Years War. The situation swung back heavily in favor of employers and landowners when the Industrial Revolution created mass unemployment and labor became dirt-cheap. That was a good time to be rich.

George Eliot and Charlotte Brontë do a pretty shit job of documenting it; the Corn Laws aren't even mentioned in Middlemarch, although the big technological setback to the weaving and dyeing industries is, peripherally. Anne Brontë was far more aware.

Tim, your thesis is historically inaccurate and doesn't hold water. Technology was the bosses' friend.

Esteban's avatar

Working from memory here, but I recall something to the effect that in the US the only times the income or wealth gap declines is during a war or recession/depression. As St. Maggie & Ronald Reagan pointed out, the price of the proles' lives improving is that the stinking rich get richer.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?